Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Preparing the manuscript, authors are kindly requested to adhere to the following regulations based on the 'Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals', developed by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
Statement of Informed Consent
Patients have a right to privacy that should not be infringed without informed consent. Identifying
information, including patients' names, initials, or hospital numbers, should not be published in
written descriptions, photographs, and pedigrees unless the information is essential for scientific
purposes and the patient (or parent or guardian) gives written informed consent for publication.
Informed consent for this purpose requires that a patient who is identifiable be shown the
manuscript to be published. Authors should identify Individuals who provide writing assistance and
disclose the funding source for this assistance. Identifying details should be omitted if they are not
essential. Complete anonymity is difficult to achieve, however, and informed consent should be
obtained if there is any doubt. For example, masking the eye region in photographs of patients is
inadequate protection of anonymity. If identifying characteristics are altered to protect anonymity,
such as in genetic pedigrees, authors should provide assurance that alterations do not distort
scientific meaning and editors should so note.
Statement of Human and Animal Rights
When reporting experiments on human subjects, authors should indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national). If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards, the authors must explain the rationale for their approach, and demonstrate that the institutional review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. When reporting experiments on animals, authors should be asked to indicate whether the institutional and national guide for the care and use of laboratory animals was followed.