Evaluation of fish‑breeding parameters of yearlings of the F1 hybrid Acipenser gueldenstaedtii Brandt, 1833 × Acipenser baerii Brandt, 1869 with short‑term introduction of probiotics of different action spectrum into the diet
Abstract
Background. Under the conditions of the global shortage of accessible animal proteins, the task to develop the effective strategy aimed at the minimizing negative consequences of the production intensification and optimization of economic indicators in aquaculture becomes urgent. One of the most promising directions in this regard is the use of probiotic additives demonstrating substantial potential for increasing productivity in the farming of aquatic organisms.
Purpose. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the fish farming parameters of fingerlings of the F1 hybrid Acipenser gueldenstaedtii Brandt, 1833 x Acipenser baerii Brandt, 1869 with short-term administration of probiotics of enzymatic and antimicrobial spectrum of action into the diet.
Materials and methods. The research work was carried out in the conditions of an integrated fish farming enterprise in the Volgograd region. The material was 900 specimen of fingerlings F1 Acipenser gueldenstaedtii Brandt, 1833 x Acipenser baerii Brandt, 1869 (RoLo) at the age of 53 days, which were divided into 3 groups (control, experiment No. 1, experiment No. 2). Fish’ diet consisted of feed with a crude protein content of 56.0±1.5%. The experimental groups of fish additionally received probiotic supplements as part of their diet: experiment No. 1 – a multi-strain probiotic with an antimicrobial spectrum of action (strains Bacillus velezensis MT55, B. velezensis МТ155), experiment No. 2 – a multi-strain probiotic with an enzymatic spectrum of action (strains B. velezensis MT14, B. velezensis MT42). The compound feeds of both experimental groups contained 0.1% probiotic powder. The experiment was carried out for 10 days. To assess the fish farming criteria, morphometric characteristics of fish were measured at the beginning and end of the experiment. The significance of the differences in the obtained values was determined using the ANOVA test. The differences between the groups were considered significant at p <0.05.
Results. During 10 days of observations, a positive effect of an enzymatic probiotic (bacterial strains B. velezensis MT14, B. velezensis MT42) on the growth rate of the F1 hybrid Acipenser gueldenstaedtii Brandt, 1833 x Acipenser baerii Brandt, 1869 was established: the average individual weight of individuals receiving an enzymatic probiotic in the diet was 36.89% higher compared with the control group (p>0.05). The increase in total biomass in this group was 56.95% higher than in the control group. The values of the specific growth rate in this group of fish were also higher compared to the control and experimental group No. 1.
Conclusion. The data obtained confirm the prospects of using probiotics, especially the enzymatic spectrum of action, to intensify sturgeon aquaculture, improve their growth and reduce feed costs. The study highlights the importance of further developments in the field of specialized probiotic supplements to improve the efficiency of fish farming.
EDN: DKWJKE
Downloads
References
Васильева, Л. М. (2017). Проблемы и перспективы развития аквакультуры осетровых рыб в современных условиях. В: Материалы докладов Международной научно практической конференции (10–12 октября 2017, Астрахань), с. 7–10. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XTSTML
Грозеску, Ю. Н., Бахарева, А. А., & Шульга, Е. А. (2009). Биологическая эффективность применения пробиотика субтилис в составе стартовых комбикормов для осетровых рыб. Известия Самарского научного центра Российской академии наук, 11(1 2), 42–45. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LMAVQJ
Кононенко, С. И., & Юрина, Н. А. (2016). Применение пробиотиков «Бацелл» и «Споротермин» в рационах молоди осетровых рыб. Сборник научных трудов Краснодарского научного центра по зоотехнии и ветеринарии, 5(1), 71–75. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VWLQIV
Юрин, Д. А., Осепчук, Д. В., Данилова, А. А., & Тлецерук, И. Р. (2022). Влияние применения пробиотиков на рыбоводно биологические показатели и приросты осетровых рыб. Сборник научных трудов Краснодарского научного центра по зоотехнии и ветеринарии, 11(1), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.48612/sbornik 2022 1 23. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CVRPBN
Dawood, M. A. O., et al. (2019). Probiotic application for sustainable aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture, 11(3), 907–924.
El Saadony, M. T., et al. (2021). The functionality of probiotics in aquaculture: An overview. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 117, 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2021.07.007. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OTGFQC
Gatesoupe, F. J. (1999). The use of probiotics in aquaculture. Aquaculture, 180(1–2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044 8486(99)00187 8. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LULGSD
Hoseinifar, S. H., et al. (2016). Probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic supplements in sturgeon aquaculture: a review. Reviews in Aquaculture, 8(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12082. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WUYOVN
Hotel, A. C. P., et al. (2001). Health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. Prevention, 5(1), 1–10.
Irianto, A., Robertson, P. A. W., & Austin, B. (2003). Oral administration of formalin inactivated cells of Aeromonas hydrophila A3 51 controls infection by atypical A. salmonicida in goldfish, Carassius auratus (L.). Journal of Fish Diseases, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365 2761.2003.00439.x. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BEYMFX
Llewellyn, M. S., et al. (2014). Teleost microbiomes: The state of the art in their characterization, manipulation and importance in aquaculture and fisheries. Frontiers in Microbiology, 5, 207.
Merrifield, D. L., et al. (2010). The current status and future focus of probiotic and prebiotic applications for salmonids. Aquaculture, 302(1–2), 1–18.
Moraes, A. V., et al. (2018). Autochthonous probiotic as growth promoter and immunomodulator for Astyanax bimaculatus cultured in water recirculation system. Aquaculture Research, 49(8), 2808–2814. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13743. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YJRJDV
Ridha, M. T., & Azad, I. S. (2016). Effect of autochthonous and commercial probiotic bacteria on growth, persistence, immunity and disease resistance in juvenile and adult Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture Research, 47(9), 2757–2767.
Rohani, M. F., et al. (2022). Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics improved the functionality of aquafeed: Upgrading growth, reproduction, immunity and disease resistance in fish. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 120, 569–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2021.12.037. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZMDHBT
Sayes, C., Leyton, Y., & Riquelme, C. (2018). Probiotic bacteria as an healthy alternative for fish aquaculture. В: Antibiotic Use in Animals (pp. 115–132).
References
Vasilyeva, L. M. (2017). Problems and prospects for the development of sturgeon aquaculture in modern conditions. In Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (Astrakhan, October 10–12, 2017) (pp. 7–10). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XTSTML
Grozesku, Yu. N., Bakhareva, A. A., & Shulga, E. A. (2009). Biological efficiency of using the probiotic Subtilis in starter compound feeds for sturgeon fish. Proceedings of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 11(1 2), 42–45. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LMAVQJ
Kononenko, S. I., & Yurina, N. A. (2016). Application of probiotics “Bacell” and “Sporotermin” in diets of juvenile sturgeon fish. Collection of Scientific Papers of the Krasnodar Scientific Center for Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 5(1), 71–75. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VWLQIV
Yurin, D. A., Osepchuk, D. V., Danilova, A. A., & Tletseruk, I. R. (2022). The effect of probiotic use on fish farming biological indicators and growth rates of sturgeon fish. Collection of Scientific Papers of the Krasnodar Scientific Center for Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 11(1), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.48612/sbornik-2022-1-23. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CVRPBN
Dawood, M. A. O., et al. (2019). Probiotic application for sustainable aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture, 11(3), 907–924.
El Saadony, M. T., et al. (2021). The functionality of probiotics in aquaculture: An overview. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 117, 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2021.07.007. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OTGFQC
Gatesoupe, F. J. (1999). The use of probiotics in aquaculture. Aquaculture, 180(1–2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00187-8. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LULGSD
Hoseinifar, S. H., et al. (2016). Probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic supplements in sturgeon aquaculture: A review. Reviews in Aquaculture, 8(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12082. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WUYOVN
Hotel, A. C. P., et al. (2001). Health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. Prevention, 5(1), 1–10.
Irianto, A., Robertson, P. A. W., & Austin, B. (2003). Oral administration of formalin inactivated cells of Aeromonas hydrophila A3 51 controls infection by atypical A. salmonicida in goldfish, Carassius auratus (L.). Journal of Fish Diseases, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2761.2003.00439.x. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BEYMFX
Llewellyn, M. S., et al. (2014). Teleost microbiomes: The state of the art in their characterization, manipulation and importance in aquaculture and fisheries. Frontiers in Microbiology, 5, 207.
Merrifield, D. L., et al. (2010). The current status and future focus of probiotic and prebiotic applications for salmonids. Aquaculture, 302(1–2), 1–18.
Moraes, A. V., et al. (2018). Autochthonous probiotic as growth promoter and immunomodulator for Astyanax bimaculatus cultured in water recirculation system. Aquaculture Research, 49(8), 2808–2814. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13743. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YJRJDV
Ridha, M. T., & Azad, I. S. (2016). Effect of autochthonous and commercial probiotic bacteria on growth, persistence, immunity and disease resistance in juvenile and adult Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture Research, 47(9), 2757–2767.
Rohani, M. F., et al. (2022). Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics improved the functionality of aquafeed: Upgrading growth, reproduction, immunity and disease resistance in fish. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 120, 569–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2021.12.037. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZMDHBT
Sayes, C., Leyton, Y., & Riquelme, C. (2018). Probiotic bacteria as an healthy alternative for fish aquaculture. In Antibiotic Use in Animals (pp. 115–132).
Copyright (c) 2025 Dmitry V. Rudoy, Alexander A. Korchunov, Anastasiya V. Olshevskaya, Victoria N. Shevchenko, Alexander V. Startsev, Tatyana A. Maltseva, Maria S. Mazanko

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.






















































